Didn't insult anyone. Just pointed out that explanations of how answers are derived is better than just posting an answer out of the blue. GA is a bit acerbic...but she posts good solutions to often very difficult questions......I got no problem with that....take it with a grain a of salt.... Pretty sure GA has laughed at some of my solutions too......don't be a snowflake. Grow a thicker skin....cowgirl or cowboy up!
Short answer: No it is NOT positive values of y from 4 to infinity.....
Correct answers 2 4 5 choice Ooops option 5 is not correct....my mistake [ 2,2.5] WOULD be correct.
https://web2.0calc.com/questions/help_4980
THIS is EXACTLY the same as (your?) previous post....with slightly different numbers....you should be able to figure this out by seeing that post !
x = the number
6*x +7 < 32 Now solve for 'x' just as before.....
Just posting 'something' should not be a way to garner 'points'. If you post an original answer to a question (SIGNIFIGANTLY different method than a previous answer)....or you post a decent MATH question...you should get a point or two....nothing else should 'score'....you shouldn't get NEGATIVE points unless you post obnoxious or derogatory things.
Need a little clarification here.... what is little 'm' ?
If Big M is 5 or 10 then little m can be 11 12 13 14 15 ......24
3 * x + 7 < 17 subtract 7 from both sides
3*x < 10
x< 3.3333 so x < 4 Largest number would be 3
Yeppers !
It usually does help....at least she has the correct answer.....and an explanation as to how it was derived, rather than just giving an answer (which is really not why we are here).
You are getting there:
You forgot the 1/2 part triangle area = 1/2* base * height
The difference is 'How much bigger is the larger than the smaller?' DOes that help?
