GingerAle

avatar
BenutzernameGingerAle
Punkte2511
Membership
Stats
Fragen 4
Antworten 740

 #4
avatar+2511 
+2

Hi Melody,

 

Ok . . .  I did not know that. I was really scratching my chimp head on this.

 

I did note that she was totally lacking in gratitude with words or points, but such behaviors are not rare on here.  

 

By dumb luck, I managed to snag copies of a few of the better question posts shortly after the answers posted, but before she deleted the questions.  I noticed two deleted posts; I assumed they were malfunctions. I should have been aware though, because she did the same thing with her Sapchats, leaving 40+ followers without a history, except for a statement about being too lazy to post. It’s not true; no one has that many followers with no posts.    

 

Her aberrant behavior seems to be integral to her current personality. If she does return, it’s likely her behavior will too.  One of my psychology professors is always interested in anecdotal observations of anomalous behavior.  I may relay this to him in the fall. 

 

Two years ago, Nauseated noticed a forum member who started deleting his older posts—his answers to questions. He deleted six pages worth, and then quit doing it after posting the reason why.  You may remember this: http://web2.0calc.com/questions/good-luck-with-this-one#r11

 

Naus said, “It’s only a few picoteslas. It’s not a great loss. I’m not sure if he was serious or being his trolling self—probably both. He did add if Heureka, Alan, CPhill, Rom, Bretie, or Melody did it, then it would be like having a major fire in the mathematics section of a unique library. 

 

In the case of Miranda, I think she should have pressed ‘Ctrl-Alt’ before pressing delete. Her questions are not unique, but the solution presentations are, and those questions were the signposts for the pathways.

 

Maybe we can restore a few of these. I can post the questions as a guest and the original answerers can copy their answers to the new post. 

 

GA

 

P.S. Have a nice daylaugh

.

06.08.2017
 #5
avatar+2511 
+4

Solutions for A - E

 

\(\text{Position and Time }\\ \begin{array}{|rcll|} \hline a_1) \text { position }\\ h &=& v_i(t) -\dfrac{1}{2} g(t)^2 \\ h &=& 15t - 4.9t^2 \\ t\tiny \; \text{ @} \small \text { 1 and 4}\\ h &=& 15(1) - 4.9(1)^2 &=&10.1m \\ h &=& 15(4) - 4.9(4)^2 &=&-18.4m \\ a_2) \text { velocity} \\ v_f &=& v_i – gt \\ v_f &=& 15 - 9.8t \\ \text{t @ 1 and 4} \\ v_f &=& 15 - 9.8(1) &=&5.20m/s \\ v_f &=& 15 - 9.8(4) &=& -24.2m/s \\ \hline \end{array}\\ \text { at 1 second: ball is 10.1m (above) and moving @ 5.20 m/s (up)} \\ \text { at 4 seconds: ball is -18.4m (below) and moving -24.2 m/s(down)} \\\)

 

\(b)\text {Gravity is slowing ball} \\ \begin{array}{|rcll|} \hline v^2 &=&v_0^2 +2(a)(\Delta y) \\ v^2 &=&(15)^2 +2(-9.8)(5m) \leftarrow \text{ use negative acceleration} \\ v &=&\pm \sqrt{127} \text{ (use positive result) } \\ v &=& 11.27m/s \\ \hline \end{array}\)

 

\(c)\text {Maximum height occurs when the vertical velocity is zero (0)} \\ \begin{array}{|rcll|} \hline a &=& \dfrac {(v_f – v_i)}{t} \\ t &=& \dfrac {(v_f – v_i)}{a} \\ t &=& \dfrac {(0 - 15)}{(- 9.8)} \\ t &=& \dfrac{-15}{-9.8} \\ t &=& 1.53s \\ \hline \end{array}\)

 

\(d) \text{ Acceleration is constant (g)} \\\)

 

\(e) \text{ Time after displacement }\\ \begin{array}{|rcll|} \hline t &=& \dfrac {(v_f – v_i)}{a} \\ v_f^2 &=& v_i^2 + 2(a)(\Delta y)\\ v_f &=& \pm \ sqrt{(v_i^2 + 2(a)(\Delta y)} \leftarrow \small \text {Use negative result; the ball is moving downward } \\ t &=& \dfrac{-\sqrt{(v_i^2 + 2(a)(\Delta y)} + (v_i)}{(-g)} \\ t &=& \dfrac{-\sqrt{(15^2 + 19.6*5)} + 15)}{-9.8}\\ t &=& 3.36s \\ \hline \end{array}\)

 

 

For related effects of gravity, see this.

01.08.2017
 #3
avatar+2511 
+2

Well, Mr. BB I am impressed that you know a Latin phrase.  Are you fluent in pîg Latin?  I bet you are!  I know a Latin phrase that instantly brings you to anyone’s mind.  Persona non grata

 

Like usual, and seemingly always, Mr. BB, you are wrong. Lancelot Link’s metaphorical comment definitely relates by a logical sequence to the kinematic equation it follows. I can explain this, but (again) we are back to wasting time and annoying the pîg. 

 

In this in this instance, I will try, because I love Lancelot, and truly appreciate his humor and wisdom, and the unique way he blends them to convey knowledge and information.  I don’t expect you to understand this or acknowledge it if you do. But I’m sure there a few on here who will understand and appreciate Lancelot’s teaching methods.

 

 Lancelot attached this comment to the end of a systematic series of related equations expressed in the form of hypotheticals to demonstrate macro logic from micro observations.  The hypothetical depicted above is not likely to be a casual observational experience in the real world. For this experiment to have any accuracy, one needs careful observation and high-precision timing devices.  In a related hypothetical, the observer notes the travel time from the top to the bottom of a window and derives the starting height of the object. Again, no one in the real world can casually measure this objects travel time in tenths of seconds.  

 

Lancelot’s opera metaphor extends to general observations. When one has a macro view, a tool is needed for the micro view. Here, this tool is opera glasses.   To understand the (Italian) opera one needs to understand the Italian language.   This is also true for physics. One needs to understand the language of physics: how gravity, velocity, distance, and time relate to each other.

 

Plus, the thought of a chimp watching an opera, while hanging from a rafter or sitting in a chandelier, is just plain funny to most humans and we genetically enhanced chimps.   

 

----

One final note:  The phrases Non sequitur and Non- sequitur are different.  When used as a noun, it should not have a hyphen. Using a hyphen makes it a phrasal adjective. This is a major change in the meaning.  If you wish to point out potential esoteric communication errors, you really should have higher standards.   

24.07.2017