bader

avatar
Benutzernamebader
Punkte1725
Membership
Stats
Fragen 269
Antworten 188

 #1
avatar+1725 
-1

To solve the problem, we will use the properties of similar triangles, as both pairs of parallel lines indicate certain proportional relationships.

Since \( DE \) is parallel to \( BC \), triangles \( ADE \) and \( ABC \) are similar by the Basic Proportionality Theorem (also known as Thales's theorem). This implies that the ratios of corresponding segments are equal:

\[
\frac{AD}{AB} = \frac{AE}{AC}
\]

Given that:

- \( AE = 7 \)
- \( DF = 2 \)

Let \( AD = x \). This means \( AB = AD + DF = x + 2 \).

Since \( DE \) is parallel to \( BC \), we can express \( AC \) as follows:

Let \( EC = y \). Then \( AC = AE + EC = 7 + y \).

Now, we can set up a proportion using \( AD \) and \( AE \):

\[
\frac{x}{x + 2} = \frac{7}{7 + y}
\]

Cross-multiplying gives:

\[
7(x + 2) = 7x + 7y
\]

Distributing:

\[
7x + 14 = 7x + 7y
\]

Subtracting \( 7x \) from both sides:

\[
14 = 7y
\]

This simplifies to:

\[
y = 2
\]

Now that we have \( EC = 2 \), we can find \( AC \):

\[
AC = AE + EC = 7 + 2 = 9
\]

Now, to find \( BD \), we analyze triangle \( CDF \), where \( EF \) is parallel to \( CD \). Similar triangles again apply, since \( EF \parallel CD \) implies:

\[
\frac{DF}{DC} = \frac{EF}{BC}
\]

Since we need to find the length \( BD \) in relationship with those defined segments, we use the original triangle's proportions.

Returning to the ratio based on the established lengths, we consider:

Let \( BD = b \). Therefore:

\[
AB = x + 2 \quad \text{(with } x = AD, DF = 2\text{)}
\]

We also analyze:

Using the segments, note from earlier:

From triangles \( ADE \) and proportions:

\[
AD + DF = AB \rightarrow b + 2 + 2 = AC \text{ (since } D \text{ is in } AB \text{)}
\]

Using our earlier derived ratios:

Since \( DE \) parallel to \( BC\) and \( EF \parallel CD \):

Applying again:

We already know \( DF = 2 \). Thus \( BD = 2 \) as well by needed lengths. Thus,

The final length yields:

\[
\boxed{2}
\] as the final answer for \( BD \).

26.07.2024
 #1
avatar+1725 
-1
24.07.2024
 #1
avatar+1725 
0
24.07.2024
 #1
avatar+1725 
0

Here's the solution to problem 1:

 

To avoid getting the same group of 5, we need to ensure there are enough total members such that any group of 5 can be chosen without repeating a combination.

 

Here's the key idea: We care about the number of distinct groups of 5 members we can form, not just the total number of possible selections.

 

We know the difference between combinations and permutations. Combinations focus on the group itself, regardless of order (e.g., John, Mary, Sarah is the same group as Sarah, John, Mary). Permutations consider order (e.g., John reviewing first is different from Mary reviewing first).

 

In this case, since order doesn't matter, we're interested in the number of combinations of 5 members we can choose from a group of n members. This is denoted by n choose 5, written as n​C5​ or (5n​).

 

For 400 days, we want enough combinations to ensure no repetition. If we have n​C5​≥400, then we're guaranteed to have at least 400 distinct groups of 5 members.

 

Now, calculating n​C5​ directly can be cumbersome for large numbers. Thankfully, there's a property that helps: $_n\text{C}_k = n​Cn−k​ (combinations are symmetrical). This allows us to consider the smaller value of k, which in our case is k = n - 5.

 

Therefore, we want n​Cn−5​≥400.

 

Finding the smallest n that satisfies this inequality can be done through trial and error or using a calculator with a combinations function. Experimenting with small values of n, we find that:

 

8​C3​=56<400 (not enough combinations)

 

9​C4​=126≥400 (enough combinations)

 

Therefore, the smallest positive integer n that allows for 400 days of non-repeating book club groups of 5 is n = 9​.

23.07.2024