How many integers n with 70≤n≤90 can be written as n=ab+2a+3b for at least one ordered pair of positive integers (a,b)?
This question really confused me because I don't understand what it's asking.
♥️ Thank you so much for your time and help! ♥️
Analyzing the Equation and the Range
Understanding the Equation:
We can factor the equation as follows:
n = ab + 2a + 3b
n = a(b + 2) + 3b
n = a(b + 2) + 3(b + 2) - 6
n = (a + 3)(b + 2) - 6
Implications of the Equation:
This means that n + 6 must be a product of two integers greater than 2.
Considering the Range:
We're looking for n between 70 and 90, inclusive.
So, n + 6 will be between 76 and 96, inclusive.
Finding Suitable Pairs
We need to find pairs of integers greater than 2 whose product lies between 76 and 96.
Lower Bound: The smallest product we can form with integers greater than 2 is 3 * 4 = 12. This is far below 76.
Upper Bound: We can start checking larger products.
5 * 16 = 80
6 * 13 = 78
7 * 12 = 84
8 * 11 = 88
9 * 10 = 90
Counting Valid Values of n:
For each of the products above, we can find a corresponding n by subtracting 6.
Therefore, there are 5 possible values of n between 70 and 90 that can be expressed in the given form.
Answer: There are 5 integers n with 70 ≤ n ≤ 90 that can be written as n = ab + 2a + 3b for at least one ordered pair of positive integers (a, b).
Thank you so much for your help, but that didn't work... I'm wondering where you got the −6 from in "n = a(b + 2) + 3(b + 2) - 6", and if that might be the problem? Could it be that you added it to one side, but not the other?
Here, let me give this problem a shot.
First, let's try to simplify this problem a bit. We can use Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick.
Let's factor the right side a bit for n. We get
n=ab+2a+3bn=a(b+2)+3b
Now, since we want b to be factored as well, let's add 6 to both sides. This will come in handy later.
We get
n+6=a(b+2)+3(b+2)n+6=(a+3)(b+2)
Now, this problem has transformed for numbers that match the conditions
76≤(a+3)(b+2)≤96
The only numbers that don;t satsify these conditions are numbers with only two factors and one is less than 3. Thus, we can calculate each number. Here, I did it for you! :)
Thus, since there are a total of 21 numbers and 7 are not valid, we have 21 - 7 = 14 as our final answer.
So 14 should be the answer. I'm not confident on the answer, I might have errored a bit. However, I think it's CLOSE to the right answer. Maybe 12 or 15, but 14 should be right.
Thanks! :)
To solve for the number of integers n within the interval 70≤n≤90 that can be expressed in the form
n=ab+2a+3b,
we can rearrange the equation for n:
n=ab+2a+3b=a(b+2)+3b.
Now, we can let m=b+2. Then, we can rewrite b in terms of m as b=m−2. Substituting this back into our formula gives:
n=a(m)+3(m−2)=am+3m−6=(a+3)m−6.
Now, we can rearrange this to isolate m:
n+6=(a+3)m⟹m=n+6a+3.
Since m is a positive integer, n+6 must be divisible by a+3. We can explore which integers give permissible m values by determining values of n+6:
- The smallest n is 70, so n+6=76.
- The largest n is 90, so n+6=96.
Consequently, we need to examine the integers from 76 to 96:
76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96.
Next, we can determine the possible values of a+3. Since a is a positive integer, a≥1 implies a+3≥4.
Therefore, m can take any integer value for a+3∈{4,5,6,…}.
To find integers n, we need n+6 to be divisible by each a+3:
- For k=4: n+6=76, gives .
- For : means , giving .
- For : means , yielding .
- For : which gives as .
- For : gives , yielding .
- For : gives , yielding .
Now, we can collect all the possible :
From :
From :
From :
From :
From :
From :
Next, let's find unique from all these lists:
- Compiling unique values from the sets we found: .
Thus, the unique values of between are:
Counting these gives us:
Therefore, the number of integers that can be expressed in the desired form is .
Thank you all for the help! Sadly, both 5 and 14 were wrong, and the right answer was 15 lol. Here's the problem explanation that I got after getting the problem wrong:
We use Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick: observe that , so to obtain another factor of , we need to add . So , and .
Thus we need to find how many integers with can be written as for at least one ordered pair of positive integers . Any that works must have the property that there exists positive integers and with and . Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to satisfy the condition that and are positive integers. That is, works because , but doesn't because the only possible ways to decompose as a product of two positive integers are and , and in neither of those cases can both and be positive integers.
The rest is a brute force check: we need to eliminate prime numbers, as they definitely don't allow us to have and be positive integers, and we need to eliminate numbers of the form , where is prime. Every other number has a pair of factors and that satisfy and .
We complementary count: are primes, and are twice a prime. Our answer is thus the total number of integers between and minus , or simply .